The Effects of Exercise on College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Students S.Y. 2025–2026: University of Bohol

Author's Information:

Fudalan, Dr. Marilou V.

University of Bohol 

https://orcid.org/0002-7535-7413

Bayron, Charlwin Gerald C.

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2780-3493

Dumale, Sheryl Grace J.

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5274-9238

Asucan, Julie Amor M.

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009-8844-8583

Calipes, Albert Godfrey M.

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7733-9794

Pantoja, Charmaine R.

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5432-1786

Lumbay, Junell D.

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009/0004/6560-1103

Supremo, Angel Izabel

University of Bohol College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9619-2770

Fudalan, Emmanuel Rod V.

University of Bohol 

https://orcid.org/0003-2070-2942  

Vol 03 No 05 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 05 May 2026

Page No.: 157-161

Abstract:

Aerobic exercises play a significant role in promoting overall fitness and health by enhancing cardiovascular, respiratory, and mental well-being. The study was conducted to establish the theoretical advantage in health-related fitness of two prescribed exercises, the High-Intensity, Short-Duration Circuit Training Program (HI-SDCTP) and the Moderate-Intensity, Long-Duration Circuit Training Program (MI-LDCTP), among students in Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy at the University of Bohol. This population group was selected because students tend to adopt a sedentary lifestyle, which normally restricts physical activity. A single-blinded, quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design was conducted over a four-week intervention period. Thirty-eight (38) students were randomly assigned to either the MI-LDCTP or HI-SDCTP group using an online randomizer and participated in supervised circuit training sessions twice weekly for 4 weeks, with differences in exercise intensity, duration, and rest periods. Analysis of the HI-SDCTP cohort revealed significant improvements in the mental fitness scores. However, physiological parameters, such as VO2max and resting heart rate, did not reach statistical significance. Conversely, the MI-LDCTP intervention elicited highly significant physiological adaptations, including a robust increase in VO2max and a significant reduction in resting heart rate. Comparative posttest analysis confirmed that the MI-LDCTP group achieved statistically superior improvements in aerobic capacity compared with the HI-SDCTP group, and the homogeneity of variance across all metrics was supported. While both modalities are effective for enhancing psychological well-being, these results suggest that a moderate-intensity, longer-duration approach is more efficacious for inducing rapid cardiorespiratory and autonomic adaptations within a short-term framework.

KeyWords:

Aerobic exercise, High-Intensity, Short-Duration Circuit Training Program (HI-SDCTP), Moderate-Intensity, Long-Duration Circuit Training Program (MI-LDCTP), Cardiovascular Fitness, Respiratory Efficiency, Mental Fitness.

References:

  1. Armstrong, N. (2019). Youth aerobic fitness. Pediatric exercise science, 31(2), 137-143. https://bit.ly/3NAx5V1.
  2. Atakan, M. M., Li, Y., Koşar, Ş. N., Turnagöl, H. H., & Yan, X. (2021). Evidence-based effects of high-intensity interval training on exercise capacity and health: A review with historical perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137201
  3. Ballesta-García, I., Martínez-González-Moro, I., Rubio-Arias, J. Á., & Carrasco-Poyatos, M. (2019). High-intensity interval circuit training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on functional ability and body mass index in middle-aged and older women: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16(21), 4205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214205
  4. Crowley, E., Herbert, R., Murtagh, E. M., Fitzgerald, A., & O'Connor, N. (2022). The effect of exercise training intensity on VO₂max in healthy adults: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 
  5. Franklin, B. A., Eijsvogels, T. M., Pandey, A., Quindry, J., & Toth, P. P. (2022). Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular health: A clinical practice statement of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology Part II: Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, minimum and goal intensities for exercise training, prescriptive methods, and special patient populations. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 12, 100425. https://bit.ly/4bmg8po.
  6. Guo, Z., Shi, Q., Liu, Y., Ma, T., Chen, J., & Wang, J. (2023). Effect of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness in young and middle-aged people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064745
  7. MacIntosh, B. R., Murias, J. M., Keir, D. A., & Weir, J. M. (2021). What is moderate to vigorous exercise intensity?. Frontiers in physiology, 12, 682233. https://bit.ly/4sHn5YW.
  8. Martland, R., Korman, N., Firth, J., Vancampfort, D., Thompson, T., & Stubbs, B. (2022). Can high-intensity interval training improve mental health outcomes in the general population and those with physical illnesses? A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(5), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-103984
  9. Patel, H., Alkhawam, H., Madanieh, R., Shah, N., Kosmas, C. E., & Vittorio, T. J. (2017). Aerobic vs anaerobic exercise training effects on the cardiovascular system. World Journal of Cardiology, 9(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.134
  10. Patel, P. N., Horenstein, M. S., & Zwibel, H. (2024). Exercise physiology. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://bit.ly/4sGdqlx.
  11. Qiu, Y., Fernández-García, B., Lehmann, H. I., Li, G., Kroemer, G., López-Otín, C., & Xiao, J. (2023). Exercise sustains the hallmarks of health. Journal of sport and health science, 12(1), 8-35. https://bit.ly/4dj5zG2.
  12. Raghuveer, G., Hartz, J., Lubans, D. R., Takken, T., Wiltz, J. L., Mietus-Snyder, M., ... & American Heart Association Young Hearts Athero, Hypertension and Obesity in the Young Committee of the Council on Lifelong Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Health in the Young. (2020). Cardiorespiratory fitness in youth: an important marker of health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 142(7), e101-e118. https://bit.ly/4sbJEFw.
  13. Rhodes, C. E., & Aston, S. J. (2022). Physiology, oxygen transport. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538336/.
  14. Sumicad, et al. (2023). Moderate aerobic exercise in college students' memory retention. Journal of Sports, Physical Education and Health. 
  15. World Health Organization. (2024, June 26). Physical activity. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity.