Governing Religion in Vietnam (1986-2022): A Case Study of Ho Chi Minh City

Author's Information:

Phan Thi Huyen Tran

PhD Candidate, University of Social Sciences and Humanities,

Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM)

Vol 02 No 09 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 09 September 2025

Page No.: 167-173

Abstract:

This study examines the transition from a “control” model to a “governance” model of religious policy in Vietnam over the period 1986-2022, highlighting key institutional milestones (1986, 2004, and 2016). Employing a qualitative and interdisciplinary approach that combines political science, sociology, and religious studies, the research is based on secondary sources-including Party documents, legal frameworks, government reports, and scholarly works-and applies content analysis and historical-comparative methods. Ho Chi Minh City serves as a case study, illustrating how multi-religious diversity and the complexity of religious activity have shaped local policy adaptation and governance practice. Findings reveal that institutional reforms have progressively institutionalized religious freedom while reflecting a pragmatic balance between political stability and religious expression. The case of Ho Chi Minh City demonstrates both the potential and the limitations of this governance shift, revealing administrative coordination challenges and the need for adaptability amid urban complexity. The study further suggests that Vietnam’s approach reflects efforts toward greater compatibility with international human rights norms, though this process remains gradual and selective. The paper concludes by discussing sustainability concerns under globalization, urbanization, and digital transformation, and proposes areas for further empirical research.

KeyWords:

Religious policy, Governance of religion, Freedom of belief, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Đổi Mới reforms.

References:

  1. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (1990, October 16). Resolution No. 24-NQ/TW of the Politburo on strengthening religious affairs in the new situation.
  3. Davie, G. (2007). The sociology of religion. London: Sage.
  4. García Álvarez, G. (2023, July 25). The renaissance of Vietnam: Globalization as the key to success. We Are Innovation. https://www.weareinnovation.global/the-renaissance-of-vietnam-globalization-as-the-key-to-success/
  5. Government Committee for Religious Affairs (GCRA). (2022). Religions and religious policy in Vietnam. Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers.
  6. GCRA. (2005). Vietnamese legal documents on belief and religion. Hanoi: Religion Publishing House.
  7. Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2005, March 1). Decree No. 22/2005/ND-CP of the Government guiding the implementation of several articles of the Ordinance on Belief and Religion. Vietnam Law Library. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Van-hoa-Xa-hoi/Nghi-dinh-22-2005-ND-CP-huong-dan-Phap-lenh-tin-nguong-ton-giao-52884.aspx
  8. Ho Chi Minh City Committee for Solidarity of Vietnamese Catholics. (2019). Report on the review of the patriotic emulation movement and activities of the Committee for Solidarity of Vietnamese Catholics in 2018, and orientations and tasks for 2019. Unpublished internal document, Vietnam Fatherland Front Committee of Ho Chi Minh City.
  9. Ho Chi Minh City Department of Home Affairs, Committee for Religious Affairs (HCMC DOHA-CRA). (2023). Report on the situation and results of state management of belief and religion in 2023, and directions and tasks for 2024. Unpublished internal document, Ho Chi Minh City Department of Home Affairs.
  10. Le, L. T. (2024). Transformation in beliefs and religious practices among religious followers in present-day Vietnam. Vietnam Studies Journal, 8(3), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.54631/VS.2024.83-636573
  11. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1995). Complete works, Vol. 20. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House.
  12. Modood, T. (2013). Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Nguyen, A. C., Do, Q. H., Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, V. H., Pham, Q. T., Vu, B. T., & Tran, M. U. (2022). The changes in religious policy and consequences for freedom of religion and belief in Vietnam. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(6), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0150
  14. Nguyen, H. D. (2015). The viewpoints and policies on religion of the Party and the State of Vietnam: A 40-year process (1975-2015). Religious Studies Review, 5(143), 3-33.
  15. Phan, T. H. T. (2025). The transformation of religious life in Ho Chi Minh City and emerging issues. State Management Review. https://www.quanlynhanuoc.vn/2025/04/29/su-chuyen-bien-doi-song-ton-giao-tren-dia-ban-tp-ho-chi-minh-va-nhung-van-de-dat-ra/?
  16. Ramet, S. P. (1993). Religious policy in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Roszko, E. (2021). Controlled religious plurality: Possibilities for covenantal pluralism in Vietnam. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 19(3), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2021.1954421
  18. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  19. Tran, T. T. H. (2022). The changes in the religious and belief life of Vietnamese people in the current period: From practice to policy. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2022.v04i06.001
  20. U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF). (2022). Annual report 2022: Vietnam chapter. Washington, DC: USCIRF.
  21. United Nations. (1994). Human development report. New York: UNDP.
  22. Vietnam Fatherland Front Committee of Ho Chi Minh City (VFF Ho Chi Minh City). (2020). Five-year review report on the implementation of Conclusion No. 02/KL-ĐCT (December 29, 2015) of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the Vietnam Fatherland Front on renewing the content and methods of the Vietnam Fatherland Front’s activities in religious affairs. Unpublished internal document, Vietnam Fatherland Front Committee of Ho Chi Minh City.