Current Research Bulletin

Ship maneuverability remains a cornerstone of maritime safety and operational efficiency, particularly under the influence of environmental stressors such as wind and ocean currents. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of how these forces, individually and in combination, impact vessel handling across diverse operational contexts, with focused case studies from Nigerian ports: Lagos (Apapa), Bonny River, and Calabar. Utilizing a mixed- methods approach, including literature synthesis, incident analysis, expert survey (n=59), and theoretical modelling, the research identifies critical vulnerabilities in current navigational practices and evaluates the efficacy of technological and operational countermeasures. Findings reveal that crosswinds exceeding 25knots and tidal currents above 3knots significantly compromise lateral control, especially for vessels with high windage areas (e.g., container ships) or deep drafts (e.g., tankers). The compounding effect of simultaneous wind and current forces increases navigational risk by up to 70% in confined channels. While tug assistance and pilot expertise remain highly effective (rated 4.7/5), adoption of advanced technologies like Dynamic Positioning Systems (DPS) remains low (12% of surveyed vessels). Real-time environmental data integration is inconsistently available (41%), and simulation- based training is underutilized (29%). The study proposes a three-pillar framework for improvement: (i) Enhanced crew training using scenario-based simulators, (ii) Strategic deployment of DPS and AI-enhanced predictive routing tools, and (iii) Infrastructure and policy upgrades in high-risk ports. Recommendations include standardized “green window” scheduling during slack tides, mandatory environmental briefings pre-berthing, and regulatory incentives for DPS adoption. This research contributes actionable, regionally contextualized insights to bridge the gap between theoretical hydrodynamics and real-world ship handling, supporting global efforts to enhance maritime resilience in an era of climate volatility and increasing vessel scale.

Ship maneuverability, wind forces, ocean currents, dynamic positioning, Nigerian ports, maritime safety, pivot point, simulation training, environmental navigation, case study analysis.

1. Baatz, Y. (2014). MaritimeLaw. Informa Law from Routledge.
2. BBC.(2021). Ever Given: Suez Canal blockage sparks global shipping crisis. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com
3. Becker, T., Hu, Y., & Bruns, A. (2020).Advances in DynamicPositioning Systems for Enhanced Ship Maneuverability. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 19(2), 67–84.
4. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods(4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
5. Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J. P., &Langard, B. (2013).Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 26–37.
6. Chen, X., & Fang, Q. (2019). Analysis of Ship Maneuverability in Confined Waters under Wind and Current Effects. Ocean Engineering, 182, 45–58.
7. Chislett, M. S., & Chapman, R. J. (1975). The behaviour of ships in currents. Ocean Engineering, 2(4), 221–230.
8. De Kat, J. O., & Peters, A. H. L. (1984). Wind Loads on Ships. Ocean Engineering, 11(6), 489–504.
9. Dubbeldam, J. L. (2019). Tidal Current Effects on Ship Handlingin European Ports. Journal of Navigation, 72(4), 889–905.
10. Faltinsen, O. M. (2005). Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. Cambridge University Press.
11. Fossen, T. I. (2011). Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. Wiley.
12. Houttuin, P. (2020). Maritime Accident Analysis: Wind and Current Effects on Vessel Handling. Maritime Safety and Security Research Journal, 7(1), 23–41.
13. International Maritime Organization (IMO).(2020). Maritime SafetyCommittee Report on Ship Maneuverability. London: IMO Publishing.
14. Jones, R., & Pearce, M. (2022). Navigational Challenges in Modern Shipping: The Role of Technology and Human Factors. Journal of Navigation, 75(3), 489–507.
15. Kishk, S. M., & Kholeif, S. E. (2022).Lessons learned from the Ever Given grounding incident: A review. Maritime Policy & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1967832
16. Lee, C. H., & Yang, S. H. (2003). A Study on the Effect of Currents on Ship Maneuverability. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 40(4), 11–22.
17. Lu, R., Zhang, Y., & Meng, Q. (2015). Optimal route planning for a ship in dynamic currents. Ocean Engineering, 110, 147–157.
18. Marine Policy, 62, 68–74.
19. Meier, K., Håkansson, L., & Berg, H. (2019). Training and Simulation for Ship Maneuverability in Adverse Weather Conditions. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(1), 24–39.
20. Newman, J. N. (1977).Marine Hydrodynamics. MIT Press.
21. NIMASA. (2021). Maritime Safetyin Nigerian Waters:Challenges and Opportunities. Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency Report.
22. Oltmann, P. (2013). Wind and Current Effects on Ship Handling. The Journal of Navigation, 66(4), 519–532.
23. Rothblum, A. M. (2000).Human error and marine safety. Proceedings of the National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando, FL.
24. Sailing Vessel Handling and Seamanship. (1999). Pivot Point Dynamics. U.S. Naval Institute Press. pp. 53–70.
25. Schröder-Hinrichs, J. U., Hollnagel, E., & Baldauf, M. (2011). From Titanic to Costa Concordia: A centuryof lessons not learned. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs,10(2), 151–167.
26. Wang, X., Li, C., & Gao, Y. (2015).The impact of climate change on maritime safety.
27. Watson, R. (2013). Technology and operations management in the maritime sector: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Maritime Research, 10(3), 321–334.
28. Zheng, W., & Zhang, L. (2021). Evaluating Maneuvering Strategies for Ships under Current and Wind Forces: Case Study Approach. Applied Ocean Research, 108, 102–115.