Current Research Bulletin

Contemporary armed conflicts increasingly take the form of prolonged wars of attrition, in which military strategies focus on gradually exhausting the adversary rather than achieving rapid battlefield victories. This study examines how prolonged armed conflicts influence civilian security and societal resilience.

The study employs a qualitative comparative approach and analyzes three contemporary conflict environments: Ukraine, Syria, and Gaza. The research explores four key dimensions of humanitarian impact: civilian exposure to explosive violence, forced displacement, disruption of infrastructure and food systems, and long-term psychological and social consequences.

The findings indicate that attrition warfare produces cumulative humanitarian consequences that extend beyond immediate battlefield violence. Sustained military pressure gradually erodes economic, institutional, and social foundations of civilian life.

Understanding the civilian consequences of attrition warfare is essential for improving international approaches to civilian protection and humanitarian governance.   

armed conflict, attrition warfare, civilian security, forced displacement, human security, humanitarian crisis, infrastructure destruction

1. ACLED (2023). Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project. https://acleddata.com/sites/default/files/wp-content-archive/uploads/dlm_uploads/2023/06/ACLED_Codebook_2023.pdf ;
2. Blattman, C., Miguel, E. (2010). Civil war. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 3 – 57;
3. Crawford, N. C. (2023). The humanitarian consequences of Russia – Ukraine war. Costs of War Project, Brown University;
4. Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford University Press;
5. Kaldor, M. (2012). New and Old Wars: Organized violence in a Global Era (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press;
6. Kalyvas, S. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press;
7. Newman, E. (2010). Critical human security studies. Review of International Studies, 36 (1), 77 – 94;
8. Paris, R. (2001). Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? International Security, 26 (2), 87 – 102;
9. Pettersson, T., Öberg, M. (2020). Organized violence, 1989 – 2019. Journal of Peace Research, 57 (4), 597 – 613;
10. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution (3rd ed.). Polity Press;
11. Slim, H. (2016). Humanitarian ethics: A guide to the morality of aid in war and disaster. Oxford University Press
12. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2023). SIPRI yearbook 2023. SIPRI;
13. United Nations Development Programme (1994). Human development report 1994. UNDP;
14. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2023). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2022. UNHCR;
15. Watling, J., Reynolds, N. (2022). Operation Z: The death throes of imperial delusion. Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).